The Decision to Privatize as an Economic Policy Idea: Epistemic Communities, Palace Wars, and Diffusion
نویسندگان
چکیده
We would like to acknowledge financial support of INSEAD and the University of Texas and the comments of Frank Dobbin and other members of the working group on the International Diffusion of Democracy and Markets. Andrew Spicer has been an important inspiration for many of the ideas in this paper. 2 Abstract The diffusion of economic ideas is often attributed to a homogenization of world culture that instructs policymakers, despite different national contexts, to adopt common policies. Our analysis below supports the broad contention of diffusion of privatization as an idea, while underscoring the heterogeneity, or " palace wars " , among ideological stances within an epistemic community. The results show that the diffusion of privatization as an idea was significantly affected by American-trained (and particularly Chicago-trained) economists in the adopting countries. Diffusion of privatization as an economic idea reflects less a learning or emulation of better policies, but the dynamics of discourse and ideology among knowledgeable individuals in a globally dispersed epistemic community.
منابع مشابه
Three worlds of health technology assessment: explaining patterns of diffusion of HTA agencies in Europe - CORRIGENDUM.
In the past two decades, setting up independent health technology assessment (HTA) agencies has become a popular tool to inform reimbursement decision-making in health care, spreading from Northern European countries across Western Europe but much less so to post-communist countries. Structural political science explanations leave gaps in clarifying this diffusion pattern. This paper proposes a...
متن کاملAn epistemic community comes and goes? Local and national expressions of heart health promotion in Canada
BACKGROUND The objective of this study is to examine the existence and shape of epistemic communities for (heart) health promotion at the international, national, provincial and regional levels in Canada. Epistemic community may be defined as a network of experts with an authoritative claim to policy relevant knowledge in their area of expertise. METHODS An interpretive policy analysis was em...
متن کاملPolitical Incentives to Privatize
The scope of the public sector (i.e. what activities are undertaken by public rather than private entities) is a decision made by politicians. While there are economic costs and benefits to privatization, there is also a political benefit to incumbents: By privatizing today, politicians transfer future revenues (when they might not be in office) to the present. This political benefit leads to o...
متن کاملPathology of the Elite's Role in Decision Making from a Public Policy Perspective
If, according to Gaetano Mosca, the Italian social thinker, we define elites as individuals and groups, that, as a result of the power they gain, they plan idea and, as a result of that, make decisions that are effective in the community action; thus, at the macro and national levels, the elites and experts of each country are considered as the most important and valuable treasure of the countr...
متن کاملThe Global Diffusion of Public Policies: Social Construction, Coercion, Competition, or Learning?
Social scientists have sketched four distinct theories to explain a phenomenon that appears to have ramped up in recent years, the diffusion of policies across countries. Constructivists trace policy norms to expert epistemic communities and international organizations, who define economic progress and human rights. Coercion theorists point to powerful nation-states, and international financial...
متن کامل